October DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsSlow PC?RecommendedPC slow today? Run a repair scan before it gets worseResolve common Windows issues and optimize system performance.Scan NowOctober DealsAmazon USDeal season is back - check today's better picksAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
Skip to content
Entry 510Filed under Breeding

Animal-Keeping Ban Appeal Dismissed After Court Cites “High Probability” of Future Neglect

Swansea Crown Court dismissed Matthew Mark Andrews’s appeal against a ten-year animal-keeping ban after the court expressed concern about a high probability of future neglect.
2-minute read By Animalso Team
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Swansea Crown Court dismissed Matthew Mark Andrews’s appeal against a ten-year ban on keeping animals on 18 September 2026, according to Swansea Bay News. The report says the court upheld the disqualification because it was concerned about a “high probability of neglect in the future.”

What happened in the appeal?

Andrews argued that there was no need for an animal-keeping ban. The appeal concerned the ten-year disqualification imposed after he pleaded guilty to failing to meet his dog Pandora’s needs under the Animal Welfare Act. It did not challenge the other parts of the magistrates’ sentence: a 12-week custodial term suspended for 12 months and 20 rehabilitation activity days.

Swansea Bay News reported that Swansea Crown Court dismissed the appeal and added £750 in appeal costs to the £400 costs ordered by magistrates. The report says the ban is expected to remain in place until summer 2036; it does not give an exact end date.

Why did the court uphold the ban?

Swansea Bay News attributes this explanation to the court: “This was gross and long-standing neglect. The defendant should not have any animals for a significant period. We are concerned about a high probability of neglect in the future.” The reported concern was specific to Andrews’s case; it should not be read as a general prediction about people convicted of animal neglect.

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

The report does not identify the judge or judges who made the decision. The primary appeal judgment and a formal case citation were not available in the reporting, so the full reasoning and exact order cannot be independently confirmed from that account.

What happened to Pandora?

According to Swansea Bay News’s account of what the courts heard, Pandora weighed 25 kg in August 2023. On 21 November 2025, Andrews contacted the PDSA because she had not eaten for four or five days and had lost weight. She then weighed 18.4 kg.

A veterinarian reportedly found Pandora severely emaciated, with her spine, ribs and hips readily visible. Her condition was so severe that her pregnancy was not apparent; a scan showed seven to nine puppies. She also had a chronic yeast skin infection and a twisted section of small intestine.

Pandora underwent emergency surgery but later developed another blockage. The report says veterinarians concluded she would not survive another major operation, so she was euthanized. Her puppies died with her.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

How the case reached the appeal

  1. November 2025: Andrews contacted the PDSA about Pandora’s lack of appetite and weight loss, according to the report.
  2. July 2026: He pleaded guilty to failing to meet Pandora’s needs. Swansea magistrates imposed a 12-week custodial sentence suspended for 12 months, 20 rehabilitation activity days, a ten-year animal-keeping disqualification and £400 in costs.
  3. 18 September 2026: Swansea Crown Court dismissed the appeal against the disqualification and ordered a further £750 in costs, as reported by Swansea Bay News.

The account of the outcome and hearing details comes from Alastair Isaac’s Swansea Bay News report, published 3 October 2026. It reports the appeal result and quotes the court, but is not the appeal judgment itself.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More from Field Notes

  1. Entry 01Can dogs get the coronavirus (COVID-19)?Dog Health9 min
  2. Entry 0227 of the best heated dog beds (Options and Reviews) in 2022Pet Product Reviews10 min
  3. Entry 0331 of the Best Heating Pads for Dogs (and other Pets)Pet Product Reviews5 min
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You DownFree scan - exact matches
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?Free scan - under a minute

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.