October DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsPC HealthRecommendedCrashes, freezes, slowdowns? Check your PC nowSpot repairable issues before they interrupt work.Check PCOctober DealsAmazon USDeal season is back - check today's better picksAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
Skip to content
Breeding

Why Marine Life Gathers Around WWII Munitions and Ghost Ships

Sunken ships and WWII munitions can become hard-substrate habitat, yet the same sites may contain explosives, fuel, invasive species or cultural hazards. NOAA’s Gulf of Mexico and Oahu surveys show both sides.

By Animalso Team 4 min read
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Fish, corals, sponges and invertebrates often colonize sunken ships and discarded munitions because the objects add hard surfaces, vertical relief and crevices to otherwise soft or featureless seabeds. That ecological use can coexist with serious danger: a wreck may retain oil, fuel or explosives, damage nearby habitat, or spread invasive species. Marine life is using the structure—not benefiting from unexploded ordnance as such.

Why do fish live around shipwrecks?

Much of the seafloor is sand or mud, which offers few places for attached organisms to settle. Steel hulls, artillery shells and other debris create firm surfaces where microbes, algae, corals, sponges and other invertebrates can attach. Openings and collapsed compartments provide shelter for fish and mobile animals, while the structure can concentrate feeding opportunities.

NOAA’s synthesis describes wreck communities extending from microbes and algae to corals, sponges, invertebrates, fish and larger predators. NOAA also estimates that about three million shipwrecks lie across oceans, rivers and lakes; that is an estimate, not a current census.

What the Gulf of Mexico wreck study found

A government multidisciplinary study examined seven World War II-era wrecks in the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Six of the wrecks resulted directly from wartime activity in 1942. Researchers investigated six sites over 18 days with a remotely operated vehicle at depths from 87 to 1,964 metres.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
#1 Best Overall
Sale
Underwater Photography Masterclass
  • Orders are despatched from our UK warehouse next working day.

At every depth studied, the abundance and species richness of hard-substrate epifaunal invertebrates decreased as sampling locations moved farther from the wrecks. The pattern shows a localized association between wreck structure and attached invertebrate communities at those sites. It does not establish that every wreck produces the same effect, and other organisms in the study also varied with depth and local habitat.

Ordnance Reef off Oahu: refuge alongside contamination questions

NOAA’s June 2006 survey covered a five-square-nautical-mile area off Pokai Bay, Oahu, known as Ordnance Reef. The munitions included small-arms projectiles, large-caliber artillery projectiles and naval gun ammunition.

Most observed munitions had coral growth. NOAA reported that they provided some of the only refuge for fish on otherwise uncolonized hard bottom. The survey combined seafloor mapping and imaging with remotely operated vehicle work and sampling by specially trained divers, and was requested and funded by the U.S. Department of Defense.

The biological observation is not a safety certification. In the sampled material, NOAA detected no RDX, TNT or tetryl. DNT was detected in four sediment samples—three near munitions and one not associated with munitions—and no explosives or related compounds were detected in sampled fish. Those results apply to the locations, samples and methods used in that survey; they do not prove that unexploded ordnance is harmless or beneficial in general.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Do shipwrecks become artificial reefs?

They can function as artificial reefs, but the terms are not interchangeable. NOAA defines an artificial reef as a man-made structure that may mimic characteristics of a natural reef. Submerged shipwrecks are the most common type, yet many wrecks were accidental wartime losses rather than structures deliberately placed for habitat.

Feature Shipwreck or discarded munition Purpose-built artificial reef Natural rocky reef
How structure arrived Usually accidental loss, disposal or wartime sinking Intentionally deployed for a management or habitat objective Geological formation
Substrate and relief Steel, concrete, shells and debris can create hard surfaces, cavities and vertical relief Designed or selected structures provide hard surface and relief Bedrock, boulders and ledges formed by natural processes
Setting Depends on the wreck’s location, depth, seabed and currents Placement site is selected, but local currents and seabed still control use Determined by geology, depth, currents and water conditions
Ecological function Can shelter fish and support attached communities; effects are site-specific Can attract high fish abundance or biomass in some regions Provides naturally developed habitat and food webs
Extra management issue Cultural remains, corrosion, oil, fuel, explosives or invasive species may be present Materials, permitting and long-term monitoring must be managed Protection from fishing, anchoring and other human impacts may be needed

NOAA research on the southeastern U.S. shelf found ecological value in shipwrecks, natural rocky reefs and intentionally placed artificial reefs, while also finding differences in how they function. In that regional work, artificial reefs hosted high abundance and biomass of reef fish and elevated abundance of top predators. That result should not be generalized into a claim that every wreck increases fish stocks or regional biodiversity.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Are sunken WWII munitions dangerous to marine life?

Potential risk depends on what a site contains, how well the structure is preserved, corrosion, nearby habitat and what monitoring has actually found. NOAA identifies several possible hazards:

  • Oil or fuel can escape, especially if a deteriorating wreck collapses.
  • Unexploded munitions can present explosive and chemical hazards.
  • A wreck can damage surrounding habitat or alter local conditions.
  • Wreck surfaces and cavities can provide footholds for invasive species.
  • Harmful cargo may remain inside a vessel long after sinking.

Consequently, a site may provide fish refuge while still requiring restrictions, contamination testing and structural monitoring. The presence of coral or fish is evidence of use of habitat, not proof that the wreck has a positive net effect or is safe to approach.

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

How scientists assess a wreck site

Conservation surveys establish a baseline before managers decide whether to monitor, restrict access or intervene. Teams may combine:

  • Historical records to identify a vessel’s cargo, sinking and wartime history.
  • Divers, remotely operated vehicles or autonomous underwater vehicles to document structure and exposed artifacts.
  • Oceanographic instruments to measure depth, currents, water conditions and sediment.
  • Biological observations and samples to identify plants, invertebrates, fish and other organisms.
  • Corrosion and threat assessments covering structural failure, pollution and human disturbance.

NOAA describes in-situ preservation as the preferred approach where appropriate under UNESCO’s underwater cultural heritage framework. That means leaving a site undisturbed when monitoring and protection can manage the risks. Divers and recreational visitors should never handle, move or disturb munitions or wreck artifacts.

What “thrives” really means

“Thrives” is best read as an observation that organisms colonize and use hard structure. Gulf surveys found denser and richer attached-invertebrate communities near particular wrecks, and the Oahu survey found coral-covered munitions serving as fish refuge on otherwise uncolonized bottom. Neither example shows that ordnance itself is good for ecosystems, that every wreck improves biodiversity, or that ecological value cancels contamination and cultural-heritage concerns.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More from Field Notes

Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?Free driver scan
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.