What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
A Waymo robotaxi struck a small, unleashed dog near Scott and Eddy streets in San Francisco on November 30, 2025. A passenger said the family heard the dog yelp and that the children cried afterward. Waymo confirmed contact with the animal; the dog’s final condition was initially unclear, and a later city transportation report described it as “reportedly struck and killed.”
A Waymo robotaxi struck a small, unleashed dog near Scott and Eddy streets in San Francisco’s Western Addition at about 8 p.m. on November 30, 2025. A passenger said the family heard the dog yelp and that the children in the vehicle cried or screamed afterward. Waymo confirmed the vehicle made contact with a small dog in the roadway, but the company’s initial statement did not say whether the animal survived. Mission Local reported the incident.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The dog’s final condition remains important to describe carefully. San Francisco Animal Care and Control received a 311 complaint but had no follow-up information after contacting the reporting party. A later San Francisco County Transportation Authority report referred to the animal as “reportedly struck and killed.” That wording does not amount to a publicly documented animal-control case resolution, so the death should be described as reported rather than independently confirmed.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What happened
The collision occurred on November 30, 2025, near the intersection of Scott and Eddy streets. The Waymo vehicle was carrying a family when it encountered the dog in the road. Waymo confirmed the event the following day, describing it as contact with “a small, unleashed dog in the roadway.” The company said it was reviewing what happened and working to improve road safety.
#1 Best Overall
- 🐾 [Keep Your dog Safe & Easy to Find — Anytime, Anywhere] Never lose track of your furry friend again! The MDTZULIK Pet Tracker GPS Collar for dogs is a smart, Android-only tracking solution that works seamlessly with Google’s Find My Device network. Whether your dogloves exploring the neighborhood or hiding in unexpected places, you can locate them quickly and accurately right from your phone.
- 💧 [Waterproof & Durable for Everyday Adventures] Built with a waterproof and rugged design, this smart collar tracker stands up to rain, puddles, and playful scratches. Ideal for both indoor and outdoor dogs, it ensures reliable performance even in challenging environments.
- 📱 [Smart Integration with Google Find My (Android Only)] Easily connect your tracker to the Find My Device app on your Android phone. No extra app downloads, no complicated setup—just simple, smart, and secure tracking at your fingertips.
- 💸[ No Monthly Fees – Ever] Say goodbye to expensive subscriptions. This GPS dog collar offers real-time location tracking with zero monthly fees, so you can focus on your pet’s safety, not hidden costs.
- [Lightweight & Comfortable for All Cats] Designed with your pet’s comfort in mind, the lightweight smart tag attaches securely to your dog’s collar without causing irritation or adding extra weight. Perfect for small, medium, or large dogs, it’s the ideal balance of comfort and security.
The passenger’s account, later reported by Mission Local and discussed in a Reddit post, supplied the most detailed description of the ride. The passenger said the family heard yelping and that the children became distressed. In one account, the passenger described the vehicle as rolling over a dog estimated to weigh roughly 20 to 30 pounds. In another quoted description, the passenger said they did not see the dog before the impact but heard the children reacting.
Those details should remain attributed to the passenger. They are not the same as independently verified vehicle-camera footage, telemetry, police evidence, or an animal-control report.
Was the dog killed?
The public record available after the collision did not initially establish the dog’s condition. Waymo’s December 1 confirmation said only that the vehicle made contact with the animal. Mission Local reported that Waymo had no status update, while San Francisco Animal Care and Control said it had received a 311 report at approximately 8:25 p.m. but had no additional follow-up information after contacting the reporting party.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteOn December 16, a San Francisco County Transportation Authority executive report described the event as a Waymo vehicle “reportedly struck and killed” a dog at the intersection. Because the government report retained the qualifier “reportedly” and did not publish an animal-control disposition, the most accurate summary is: the dog was reported to have died, but publicly available records do not provide an unqualified independent confirmation of that outcome.
What the passenger said happened after the impact
The passenger said the family tried to reach Waymo customer support and police after the collision. In a later Reddit update, the passenger said a Waymo manager contacted the family, stated that a collision report had been filed, and indicated that company personnel would try to locate the dog’s owner and offer veterinary or similar assistance.
Those follow-up details came from the passenger’s account. They were not included in the public Waymo statement quoted by Mission Local, so they should not be presented as independently confirmed company actions.
What is still unknown
Public reporting does not establish several facts that would be needed to reconstruct the collision fully:
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems- The vehicle’s speed and exact path immediately before impact.
- When the vehicle’s sensors first detected the dog.
- Whether the vehicle braked, stopped, or attempted to steer around the animal.
- The distance available between detection and impact.
- Whether the dog was moving, standing, or entering the roadway at the critical moment.
- Whether the vehicle continued moving after the collision and, if so, for how far.
- A complete animal-control or veterinary disposition for the dog.
Comments in the Reddit discussion asserted that the vehicle continued for some distance and that people gathered near the scene. Those are user-generated statements, not substitutes for Waymo telemetry, perception data, police records, animal-control records, or video.
Why the “children sob” detail needs context
The children’s reaction is part of the passenger’s firsthand account: the rider said the children were crying or screaming after hearing the dog yelp. It is not a detail independently reported as witnessed by police, animal-control officers, or another identified observer.
That distinction matters in a story involving both a distressed family and a potentially injured animal. The emotional impact on the passengers can be reported without turning an attributed account into a verified account of every detail of the collision.
Why this incident drew wider attention
The dog collision came after the widely publicized death of KitKat, a neighborhood cat killed by a Waymo vehicle in San Francisco’s Mission District. The two incidents renewed criticism from some residents and officials who were already questioning how autonomous vehicles should be supervised and expanded in the city. Mission Local reported that Supervisor Jackie Fielder called for allowing voters to decide on autonomous-vehicle operations on a county-by-county basis.
The San Francisco County Transportation Authority’s December executive report also placed the dog incident in the context of a changing Bay Area robotaxi market. It noted that Waymo had recently received California Department of Motor Vehicles approval to expand driverless operations across much of the Bay Area, while Zoox had begun limited free public robotaxi service and San Francisco was considering changes to a ride-hail pilot.
Rank #2
- REAL-TIME GPS TRACKING WITH UNLIMITED RANGE: Track your dog with live location updates every 2–3 seconds. Unlike others that update once a minute, Tractive lets you follow every step with no distance limits, anywhere in the world.
- VITAL SIGNS MONITORING: The Tractive smart tracker monitors changes in your dog’s heart and respiratory rates, helping detect potential issues before they become visible.
- HEALTH & BARKING ALERTS: The tracker learns your dog’s normal behavior and detects changes. If it notices unusual sleep, activity, or barking patterns, you’ll receive an alert so you can take action early.
- ESCAPE ALERTS & LOCATION HISTORY: Create custom virtual fences around your yard, dog park, or neighborhood. Get instant alerts if your dog leaves and review location history to retrace their steps.
- LONG-LASTING BATTERY, LIGHTWEIGHT & WATERPROOF: Tough yet light enough for any dog over 8 pounds. Fully waterproof, with up to 14 days’ battery life. Now featuring a brighter LED and louder sound for easier tracking.
That regulatory and commercial context does not show that the expansion approval caused or was connected to the dog collision. It explains why a single animal-vehicle incident received attention during a period of rapid autonomous-vehicle growth.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Do not confuse this with the Waymo school-bus investigation
On December 3, 2025, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened a separate preliminary evaluation concerning Waymo vehicles’ behavior around stopped school buses. The evaluation followed a different reported incident involving a school bus. It was not an investigation into the dog collision.
The two matters may be mentioned together only as examples of increased scrutiny of Waymo’s driverless systems. They are separate events, with different circumstances and different investigative records. The NHTSA preliminary-evaluation document should not be treated as evidence about what happened at Scott and Eddy streets.
What responsible pet owners can take from the incident
The collision is not evidence, by itself, that autonomous vehicles are more or less safe than human drivers. A single event cannot establish a controlled safety comparison. It does, however, reinforce a basic safety point: an unleashed dog near an active roadway can be exposed to severe danger, regardless of whether approaching traffic is controlled by a person or an automated driving system.
- Keep dogs secured with a properly fitted leash or another lawful restraint near streets and driveways.
- Check gates, doors, and yard fencing regularly, especially after storms, repairs, or deliveries.
- Make sure identification tags and microchip registration details are current.
- If a dog gets loose, avoid chasing it into traffic. Alert nearby drivers and contact local animal-control or emergency services when there is an immediate roadway danger.
- If an animal is struck, approach cautiously and seek veterinary or animal-control assistance; an injured dog may bite out of fear or pain.
The central accountability question
The most significant unresolved issue is not simply whether the vehicle contacted the dog. Waymo has confirmed that it did. The larger question is what the vehicle perceived, what it predicted, how it responded, and what happened to the animal afterward.
As publicly reported, the record includes Waymo’s confirmation, a passenger’s account, a 311 complaint, and the later transportation-agency reference. It does not include publicly released vehicle telemetry, complete perception data, or a definitive animal-control disposition. Those gaps limit how confidently the public can evaluate the collision and explain why precise attribution matters.
Based on the available evidence, the careful description is: a Waymo robotaxi struck a small, unleashed dog near Scott and Eddy streets on November 30, 2025; a passenger said the children cried after hearing the dog yelp; Waymo confirmed contact with the animal; and a later city transportation report said the dog was reportedly killed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened when the Waymo hit the dog?
A Waymo vehicle struck a small dog near Scott and Eddy streets in San Francisco’s Western Addition at about 8 p.m. on November 30, 2025. The vehicle was carrying a family, and the passenger said the children cried or screamed after hearing the dog yelp.
Did the dog die after being hit?
The dog’s condition was initially unknown. A December 16 San Francisco County Transportation Authority report described it as “reportedly struck and killed,” but the publicly available records do not include an unqualified animal-control confirmation of the death.
How did Waymo respond?
Waymo confirmed that its vehicle made contact with a small, unleashed dog in the roadway and said it was reviewing the incident. A passenger later said a Waymo manager contacted the family and discussed a collision report and efforts to find the owner, but those follow-up details came from the passenger and were not included in the public statement quoted by Mission Local.
Was this the same incident as the Waymo school-bus investigation?
No. NHTSA’s December 3 preliminary evaluation concerned a separate reported incident involving Waymo vehicles and stopped school buses. It was not an investigation into the dog collision.
The Bottom Line
Bottom line: Waymo confirmed that one of its robotaxis struck a small, unleashed dog in San Francisco’s Western Addition on November 30, 2025. A passenger reported that the children cried after hearing the dog yelp. The dog was later described by a transportation-agency report as “reportedly struck and killed,” but the publicly available record does not provide an unqualified animal-control confirmation of its death.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
