Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →In a documented case involving gene-edited hornless cattle, DNA from the plasmid used during editing was unexpectedly found integrated into the animals’ genome. A UK parliamentary briefing reports that the retained bacterial DNA included two antibiotic-resistance genes. This was a finding about a particular cattle line and editing process—not evidence that every gene-edited animal contains foreign DNA.
What was the DNA “screwup” in the hornless cattle?
The cattle were edited to produce the hornless, or polled, trait. In this case, the editing process used a DNA plasmid as a template or delivery construct. Instead of only the intended trait-related change being present, some plasmid DNA became integrated into the cattle’s genome. The UK Parliament’s POSTbrief describes the retained material as bacterial DNA that included two antibiotic-resistance genes: UK Parliament POSTbrief on genome editing.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Beef Cattle Production Systems (Modular Texts Series) | $53.98 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Principles of Cattle Production | $50.96 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Principles of Cattle Production (Animal & Veterinary Science) | $54.07 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Rock-It: Textbook | $123.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Breeding Services for Small Dairy Farmers: Sharing the Indian Experience | $77.71 | Buy on Amazon |
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The primary paper is titled “Template plasmid integration in germline genome-edited cattle.” Its indexed description reports complex rearrangements, including insertions, deletions, inversions and translocations. Those kinds of changes can be difficult to detect with standard PCR and sequencing approaches. The exact assay details and experimental results should be taken from the full paper, rather than inferred from its indexed description: Nature Biotechnology paper.
Why did unintended DNA matter?
Researchers and regulators needed to establish what DNA was actually present in the edited animals, not just whether they showed the intended hornless trait. Unexpected sequences associated with an editing process can complicate molecular characterization and regulatory review. The POSTbrief says the issue could be avoided by repeating the process; that is a reported outcome for this case, not proof that all animals made with gene editing acquire plasmid DNA.
#1 Best Overall
The briefing also reports that Brazil reclassified the polled cattle as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and that the animals had not been commercialised at the time the briefing covered. That is a historical account, not a statement of their current commercial status or a worldwide regulatory classification.
These were not the FDA’s slick-haired cattle
The plasmid-integration finding is sometimes easy to confuse with a separate FDA-reviewed cattle line. The differences are material:
Rank #2
| Case | Intended trait | What the cited sources say |
|---|---|---|
| Polled cattle | Hornlessness | The POSTbrief reports integration of plasmid-derived bacterial DNA, including two antibiotic-resistance genes. Brazil’s reported reclassification and the historical commercialisation status refer to this line. |
| PRLR-SLICK cattle | Slick, short hair | FDA’s March 2022 low-risk determination concerned this separate line, developed by Acceligen. FDA said the CRISPR alteration produced a trait equivalent to naturally occurring cattle mutations. Its announcement said the cattle were not then in commerce. |
FDA’s current risk-reviewed list has entries for both PRLR-SLICK and Pc-Polled cattle: FDA list of risk-reviewed intentional genomic alterations in animals. FDA cautions that a risk-reviewed determination is not a safety determination under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. It means the agency understands the risks for the specified intended use and has no safety concerns, with the possibility of reconsidering if new information emerges. The list does not make the slick-haired cattle the same animals as the polled cattle in the plasmid-integration case.
Does this mean all gene-edited cattle have foreign DNA?
No. The finding establishes that unintended plasmid DNA was present in this particular polled-cattle case; it does not establish that this happens in every gene-editing experiment or cattle line.
Rank #3
A 2021 study of cloned calves with a precise PMEL edit for coat-colour dilution reported no detectable off-target events or unintended editing-plasmid integration in the samples examined. That was a different gene, editing experiment and study design, so it cannot erase the polled-cattle finding or prove that every other edited line is free of unintended changes: 2021 study of PMEL-edited cloned calves.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What to check when comparing gene-edited cattle stories
A label such as “CRISPR cattle” does not tell you what changes were made or what testing was done. To understand a specific case, look for:
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Used Book in Good Condition
Rank #4
- Format: Book
- Genre: Rock
- Category: General Music and Classroom Publications
- Contributors: By Jane Beethoven and Carman Moore
- Pub Date: 10/1980
- The intended trait and target gene: hornlessness, short hair and coat-colour dilution are different outcomes involving different genetic targets.
- The editing and delivery method: determine whether the process used a plasmid or another DNA template, and whether researchers assessed unintended integration.
- The molecular tests and their limits: ask which changes the assays could detect. A finding that no change was detected applies to the samples and methods studied, not automatically to every possible unintended alteration.
- The animals and study design: results depend on which animals and samples were examined and what comparisons or controls were used.
- The regulator, intended use and date: a decision for one specific line does not automatically apply to another line, purpose or jurisdiction.
- The jurisdiction and date of market claims: a historical statement that animals were not commercialised, or a classification in one country, should not be treated as a current global status.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems
Leave a Reply